Cases 1 - 10 of 4,862
Whybark v. Whalen et al
as 2:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Marcus Whybark
Defendant:
Carl D. Whalen and Kenneth P. Fredericksen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hasher v. City of Rochester et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nathanial James Hasher
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Officer Edward Fritz, Officer Faudskar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George v. Jursek et al
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Defendant:
Colville Confederated Tribes, Alice Koskela, Shannon Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
Zayas v. LaRose et al
as 2:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Myriam Zayas
Defendant:
Paul LaRose, Olive Crest Adoption Agency and Issaquah School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zayas v. McCoy
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Myriam Zayas
Defendant:
Adrienne McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leighty v. Spokane County et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
James Leighty
Defendant:
Spokane County, Sheriff John Nowels and Spokane County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loop v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
John Torsten Loop
Defendant:
State of Washington, JAMS Mediation Arbitration and ADR Services and Helen L Halpert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Langworthy v. Washington Department of Social and Health Services
as 3:2024cv05373
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Washington Department of Social and Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Njoroge v. Kitsap Mental Health Services
as 3:2024cv05369
Plaintiff:
Rose Njorgoe
Defendant:
Kitsap Mental Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nelson v. Mattson
as 3:2024cv05363
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Nelson
Defendant:
James Mattson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
