Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Jason Archie Flickinger
Defendant:
Jaqueline Reyes Castillo, Robert Crisp, Pedro Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Martin Gonzalez, Sr., et al v. City of Maywood, et al
as 11-56594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN GONZALEZ, Sr., MARTIN GONZALEZ, Jr., JOSE GONZALEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MAYWOOD, MAYWOOD-CUDAHY POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRUCE LEFLAR and others
Cady v. Jackson et al
as 2:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Thomas A Cady
Defendant:
Brian E Jackson, Brian Jackson, Phillip Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Douglas Mattern et al v. PushTraffic et al
as 2:2010cv09860
Plaintiff:
Grace Adele, Bette Anderson, James K. Blanscett and others
Defendant:
Bigjohnnews.com, Christopher Bosley, John Glen Denton and others
Mattern et al v. PushTraffic et al
as 3:2010cv02924
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mattern , Sandra Little , Clarence Forcier and others
Defendant:
PushTraffic, Incfortune, Dot Intel, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Marshall Home v. Quinton Mehr, et al
as 08-16916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL EDWIN HOME
Defendant - Appellee:
QUINTON MEHR, Arizona Department of Public Safety, GREG, ADOT MVD Division, HARRY, ADOT MVD Division and others
Home v. Mehr et al
as 4:2008cv00222
Plaintiff:
Marshall E Home
Defendant:
Quentin Mehr, Greg, Harry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin Gonzalez, Sr et al v. City of Maywood et al
as 2:2007cv03469
Plaintiff:
Martin Gonzalez, Sr, Martin Gonzalez, Sr, Martin Gonzalez, Sr and others
Defendant:
City of Maywood, Maywood-Cudahy Police Department, Bruce Leflar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
