Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Tryon v. State of Washington DOC
as 2:2017cv00589
Petitioner:
Tamara Samantha Tryon
Respondent:
State of Washington DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallquist v. IDOC et al
as 1:2016cv00125
Petitioner:
Kenneth J. Hallquist
Respondent:
IDOC and WI DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Esckson v. DOC et al
as 2:2016cv00279
Petitioner:
Ryan Esckson
Defendant:
DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Saint Michael Balzarini v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 14-17005
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAINT MICHAEL DOC BALZARINI
Respondent - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, Attorney General of California, JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Acting Warden, C. GIPSON, Warden and others
Gregory Anspaugh v. Pat Glebe
as 13-35292
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY LANE ANSPAUGH
Respondent - Appellee:
PAT GLEBE, Superintendent DOC, State of Washington
St Michael Doc Balzarini v. R. Grounds
as 5:2012cv00028
Petitioner:
St Michael Doc Balzarini
Respondent:
R Grounds
Kenneth Machado v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-17727
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH SCOTT MACHADO
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Acting Director DOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Ronald Manning v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 11-16491
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD LEE MANNING
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA and CHARLES L. RYAN, Interim Director of the AZ DOC
Cunningham v. State of Washington, Secretary of DOC
as 2:2010cv00302
Petitioner:
David Leroy Cunningham
Respondent:
State of Washington, Secretary of DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne v. Director Nevada DOC et al
as 3:2010cv00446
Respondent:
Director Nevada DOC and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Daniel J. Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
