Cases 71 - 80 of 1,103
Cody Leveke v. Brown
as 23-15746
Petitioner / Appellant:
CODY RAY LEVEKE
Respondent / Appellee:
BROWN, First Name Unknown, Warden
Alfred Caraffa v. Unknown Party
as 23-15744
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFRED E. CARAFFA
Respondent / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden/Director of Arizona State Prisons
Vivian Earle v. Kline
as 23-15739
Petitioner / Appellant:
VIVIAN A. EARLE, AKA Vivian A. Earl
Respondent / Appellee:
KLINE, First Name Unknown, Warden
Fordson v. Unknown Party
as 3:2023cv08087
Petitioner:
Devin A Fordson
Respondent:
Unknown Party, Navajo County Circuit Court and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Unknown Party
as 3:2023cv08083
Petitioner:
Annette Theadora Murphy
Respondent:
Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leveke v. Brown
as 2:2023cv00654
Petitioner:
Cody Ray Leveke
Respondent:
Unknown Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Buckner v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00710
Petitioner:
Darrell Oneil Buckner
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15498
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
Felix v. Unknown Party
as 4:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
Rafael Castillo Felix
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Smith v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv00480
Petitioner:
Brian Andrew Smith
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
