General Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sinek v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv04352
Petitioner: Charles R. Sinek
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Charles Willard v. CDCR
as 18-56152
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES R. WILLARD
Respondent - Appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Montoya v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv04185
Petitioner: Arthur Montoya, Jr.
Respondent: Charles R Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brand v. People of the State of California We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02550
Petitioner: Charles R. Brand
Respondent: People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brand v. People of the State of California We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02475
Petitioner: Charles R. Brand
Respondent: People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles R Cooks v. California Supreme Court
as 2:2015cv07542
Respondent: California Supreme Court
Petitioner: Charles R Cooks
Charles Smith v. Fred Foulk
as 14-16089
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES R. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: FRED FOULK, Warden
Smith v. Foulk We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00529
Petitioner: Charles R. Smith
Respondent: Fred Foulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Foulk We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02387
Petitioner: Charles R Smith
Respondent: Fred Foulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Williams v. Kevin Chappell
as 12-55965
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES R. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee: KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?