General Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Griffith v. State of Montana et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2023cv00143
Petitioner: Brandon Griffith
Respondent: State of Montana and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Griffith v. Dan White
as 23-35401
Petitioner / Appellant: KEVIN SCOTT GRIFFITH
Respondent / Appellee: DAN WHITE
Griffith v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00853
Petitioner: Jason O Griffith
Respondent: Brian Williams, State of Nevada and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffith v. White We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01491
Petitioner: Kevin Scott Griffith
Respondent: Dan White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Griffith v. Randy Blade
as 18-35643
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER D. GRIFFITH
Respondent - Appellee: RANDY BLADES, Warden
Christopher Griffith v. Randy Blade
as 17-35704
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER D. GRIFFITH
Respondent - Appellee: RANDY BLADES, Warden
Davon Griffith v. Sandra Alfaro
as 17-55239
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVON CAREY GRIFFITH
Respondent - Appellee: SANDRA ALFARO
Griffith v. State of Montana
as 9:2015cv00142
Petitioner: Eric G. Griffith
Respondent: State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffith v. Paramo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01561
Petitioner: Andy Griffith
Respondent: Daniel Paramo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davon Carey Griffith v. Sandra Pennywell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv03251
Petitioner: Davon Carey Griffith
Respondent: Sandra Pennywell
Unknown: Julie Ann Harris

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?