Cases 1 - 10 of 24
(HC) Jansen v. Lemon
as 2:2023cv02018
Petitioner:
Michael Jansen and Michael Edward Jansen
Respondent:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Carter, et al.
as 1:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Jackson
Respondent:
Sheriff Tom Carter and Twin Falls County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Aguilar v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation a, et al
as 22-16707
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD AGUILAR
Respondent / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, CHARLES L RYAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Aguilar v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00359
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Finck #058578 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00282
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Finck
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frost v. San Mateo Superior Court
as 3:2018cv02496
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Frost
Respondent:
San Mateo Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tilton v. Kernan et al
as 2:2017cv01738
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Tilton
Defendant:
Scott Kernan and Kevin Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Aguilar v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 16-17229
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD AGUILAR
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Willis v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00432
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Willis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aguilar v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv00286
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Aguilar
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
