General Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Said Farzad v. Snohomish County Superior Cour, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-35465
Petitioner - Appellee: SAID FARZAD
Respondent - Appellant: SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and MARK ROE, Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney
Farzad v. Snohomish County Superior Court et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01805
Petitioner: Said Farzad
Respondent: Snohomish County Superior Court, Robert W Ferguson and Mark Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Cessar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01988
Petitioner: Frederick Banks
Respondent: Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. Song et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00440
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andre Boston v. E. Roe, et al
as 14-15793
Petitioner - Appellant: ANDRE BOSTON
Respondent - Appellee: E. ROE and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rupert M. Roe v. Montgomery We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02116
Respondent: Montgomery
Petitioner: Rupert M. Roe
Izea Reed v. Ernest Roe
as 2:2013cv03054
Michael Bowen v. Ernest Roe, et al
as 12-57060
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL ALLEN BOWEN
Respondent - Appellee: ERNEST ROE, Warden and CALIFORNIA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Arthur Parchue v. Ernest Roe, et al
as 12-57043
Petitioner - Appellant: ARTHUR ANDREW PARCHUE
Respondent - Appellee: ERNEST ROE, Warden and CALIFORNIA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Karimi Sutton v. Ernest Roe
as 12-56835
Petitioner - Appellant: KARIMI KWAA SUTTON
Respondent - Appellee: ERNEST C. ROE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?