Cases 11 - 20 of 1,228
Hess #353733 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Greg John Hess
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Cochise, County of, Cochise County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Walter B. Martin
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Valles v. Newsom et al
as 1:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Frank Valles
Defendant:
Galvin Newsom, State Water Resources Control Board, Martin Gamboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacey Jr. v. Felts et al
as 3:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Deshone M. Lacey Jr.
Defendant:
M. Felts, Don Barnes, K. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Khali M. Bey v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Khali M. Bey
Defendant:
Los Angeles County, Department of Children and Family Services, Jocelin Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bibbs v. Lewis et al
as 3:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
Mrs. Lewis, Davies, Mr. Banvelos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Deron James Purvis, Jr. v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Deron James Purvis, Jr.
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Riverside County Sheriff Department, Sheriff Chad Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Behlmann v. Martin et al
as 2:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ryan Behlmann
Defendant:
Martin, Sokolov, Polard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Gibson
as 5:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Foster
Defendant:
Billie Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster
as 5:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
