Cases 1 - 10 of 22
(PC) Thomas v. Aguirre et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Defendant:
J. Aguirre, A. Leyva and C. Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Edward Thomas v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2020cv01131
Defendant:
J. Welch, Christian Pfeiffer, Elizabeth Stark and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Thomas v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2019cv01501
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas and Edward N. Thomas
Defendant:
C. Pfeiffer and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Thomas v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2019cv01489
Defendant:
Contance Waddle, Ralph Diaz, S. Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas and Edward N. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Thomas v. Dave Davey, et al
as 18-16017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE DAVEY, Warden, MIKE STRAINER, Director of Corrections and Rehabilitations, R. L. BRIGGS and others
Edward Thomas v. S. Parks, et al
as 17-16754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. PARKS, Library Technical Assistant, JEFF GALLAGHER, Captain of Facility 3A, J. A. ALVARADO, Custody Sergeant Facility 3A and others
Thomas v. Parks et al
as 1:2016cv01393
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Defendant:
S. Parks, Jeff Gallagher, J.A. Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Davey et al
as 1:2016cv00925
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Defendant:
Dave Davey, Mike Strainer, R. L. Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Thomas v. J. Jenkins, et al
as 11-15652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. JENKINS, #3115 - terminated per #7 First Amended Complaint, PETZING, Sgt and 0921, Lt.
Thomas v. Beutler et al
as 2:2010cv01300
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Defendant:
M Beutler, D Nieman, L Betti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
