Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Joseph Pitts v. Nolan Espinda, et al
as 22-16599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
NOLAN ESPINDA, FRANCIS SEQUIERA, CAESAR ALTERIS, AKA Caesar Altaris and others
Rowan v. Heick et al
as 1:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
George C. L. Rowan
Defendant:
Sgt. Heick, Lori Wright, Joan Lee and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Calaveras County et al
as 2:2018cv01327
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bell
Defendant:
Calaveras County, Dana Pfeil, Marian Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Calaveras County et al
as 1:2018cv00728
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bell
Defendant:
Calaveras County, Dana Pfeil, Marian Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Mitchell v. Snowden, et al
as 16-16848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SNOWDEN, S. VANCE, LARIOS and others
Mitchell v. Snowden et al
as 2:2015cv01167
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Mitchell
Defendant:
Snowden, Vance, Larios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Mitchell v. Snowden, et al
as 13-16108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SNOWDEN, Correctional Officer at CA State Prison Sacramento, New Folson, SEATON, C/O, LARIOS, C/O and others
Michael McLaughlin v. The Alaska Supreme Court, et al
as 11-35474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
THE ALASKA SUPREME COURT, WALTER L. CARPENETI, Chief Justice, ROBERT L. EASTUAGH, Justice and others
McLaughlin v. The Alaska Supreme Court et al
as 3:2010cv00272
Plaintiff:
Michael L. McLaughlin
Defendant:
The Alaska Supreme Court, Walter L. Carpeneti, Robert L. Eastuagh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Snowden et al
as 2:2008cv01658
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Mitchell
Defendant:
Snowden, Seaton, Larios and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
