Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Maenza v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Anthony Charles Maenza
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act - Denial of Overtime Compensation
Maverick Tran et al v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2020cv00807
Plaintiff:
Victor Barrientos, Rafael Zambrano-Lay and Maverick Tran
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Veronica Danielson v. Megan Brennan, et al
as 17-35928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERONICA DANIELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General and U.S. POSTAL SERVICES SAN MATEO INFORMATION CENTER
Hiroto v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Masao Hiroto
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Elizabeth Snow and Clara Sutherland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Danielson v. Brennan et al
as 2:2016cv00476
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan and U.S. Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Veronica Danielson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Steven Utsey v. Patrick Donahue
as 12-56857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN W. UTSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK R. DONAHUE, U.S. Postal Service Postmaster General
Steven W Utsey v. Patrick R Donahue et al
as 2:2011cv10490
Defendant:
Patrick R Donahue and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Steven W Utsey
Steven W Utsey v. Patrick R Donahue et al
as 2:2011cv09817
Defendant:
Patrick R Donahue and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Steven W Utsey
Ueon Bak v. John Potter, et al
as 10-56924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UEON BAK
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific Area) Agency and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Ueon Bak v. John E Potter et al
as 8:2010cv01013
Plaintiff:
Ueon Bak
Defendant:
John E Potter and United States Postal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
