Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Noreen Barajas-Murphy v. Online Learning Consortium, Inc.
as 2:2018cv08339
Defendant:
Online Learning Consortium, Inc. and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Dr. Noreen Barajas-Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Tuality Healthcare
as 3:2014cv01498
Plaintiff:
James M. Murphy
Defendant:
Tuality Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment & Re-Employment Rights Act
Hernandez v. Tax Breaks Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv00512
Plaintiff:
Cinthia Hernandez
Defendant:
Tax Breaks Incorporated, Darius Allen, Sharmale McCallum-Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Ronald Anderson et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05037
Plaintiff:
Ralph Acle, Joseph L. Adams, Justine T. Alacar and others
Defendant:
Does and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Murphy v. Teamsters Union Local 542 et al
as 3:2012cv00340
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Teamsters Union Local 542, Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raymond Plows, et al v. Rockwell Collins, Inc.
as 11-56554
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAYMOND PLOWS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and MICHAEL S. MURPHY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Raymond Plows, et al v. Rockwell Collins, Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01936
Defendant:
DOES and Rockwell Collins, Inc
Plaintiff:
Michael S Murphy and Raymond Plows
Arthur v. Murphy Company
as 1:2010cv03142
Plaintiff:
Ernest Arthur
Defendant:
Murphy Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plows et al v. Rockwell Collins, Inc et al
as 3:2010cv01830
Plaintiff:
Raymond Plows and Michael S Murphy
Defendant:
Rockwell Collins, Inc and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cheryl A. Murphy v. Black Enterprise et al
as 2:2010cv04497
Defendant:
Black Enterprise, Does, Earl G. Graves, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A. Murphy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
