Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Agraria San Francisco, Inc. v. Clark D. Gross et al
as 2:2010cv01909
Plaintiff:
Agraria San Francisco, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Clark D. Gross
Defendant:
Clark D. Gross and Hoffman, Wasson & Gitler, PC
Cross Defendant:
Hoffman, Wasson & Gitler, PC
Permar v. Spectra Watermakers, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00972
Plaintiff:
Clark Permar
Defendant:
Spectra Watermakers, Inc.
Cross-claimant:
Spectra Watermakers, Inc.
Cross-defendant:
Clark Permar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Permar v. Spectra Watermakers, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00972
Plaintiff:
Clark Permar
Defendant:
Spectra Watermakers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
D & D Group Pty Ltd et al v. R.T. Clark Manufacturing, Inc.
as 8:2008cv00124
Plaintiff:
D & D Group Pty Ltd, D & D Group Pty Ltd, D & D Group Pty Ltd and others
Defendant:
R.T. Clark Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Mitchell v. First Northern Credit Union et al
as 2:2007cv02067
Plaintiff:
Clark A. Mitchell
Defendant:
First Northern Credit Union, First Northern Credit Union, First Northern Credit Union and others
Counter Claimant:
Credit Union 1, Credit Union 1, Credit Union 1 and others
Counter Defendant:
Clark A. Mitchell and Clark A. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
D & D Group Pty Ltd et al v. R T Clark Manufacturing Inc
as 8:2007cv00731
Plaintiff:
D & D Group Pty Ltd, D & D Group Pty Ltd, D & D Group Pty Ltd and others
Defendant:
R T Clark Manufacturing Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Brady Construction Innovations Inc v. Clark Western Framing Systems
as 2:2007cv00221
Plaintiff:
Brady Construction Innovations Inc
Defendant:
Clark Western Framing Systems and Clark Western Framing Systems
Counter Claimant:
Clark Western Framing Systems
Counter Defendant:
DOES, Slip Track Systems and Brady Construction Innovations Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
