Cases 1 - 10 of 160
Hill et al v. APM Terminals North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2024mc80016
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hill, JERI STEWART, Rhonda Johnson and others
Defendant:
APM Terminals North America, Inc., APM TERMINALS PACIFIC, LLC, Maersk A/S and others
Anderson et al v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
Melissa Anderson, Matthew Bernert, Brett Alan Boettcher and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Elizabeth De Coster et al v. Newegg, Inc.
as 2:2023mc00166
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth De Coster, Maya Gold, John Mariane and others
Defendant:
Newegg, Inc.
Hill et al v. Amentum Services, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Hill and Phillip Rowton
Defendant:
Amentum Services, Inc.
Platte River Insurance Company v. Yamakawa et al
as 3:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Platte River Insurance Company
Defendant:
Nelly Akemi Yamakawa, Michael Stephen Starnes, Rogue Valley Manor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Stark v. Hill
as 3:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
Collette Stark
Defendant:
Greg Hill
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Fannie Mae et al v. Amelia Aid Propco LLC
as 2:2023mc00012
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Amelia Aid Propco LLC, Ashley Aid Propco LLC, Bentley Aid Propco LLC and others
Receiver:
Michael F Flanagan
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, etal. v. Kootenai County Idaho
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, D/B/A AT&T Mobility, a Delaware LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as A.T. and T. Mobility
Defendant:
Kootenai County Idaho
Intervenor:
Potlatch Hill Neighborhood Group, Alissa Desancic, Joel Bowlby and others
Yida Gao et al v. Adam Struck et al
as 2:2023mc00030
Petitioner:
Yida Gao, Sand Hill Advisors PR LLC and Shima Capital Management LLC
Respondent:
Adam Struck doing business as Struck Capital Management LLC and Struck Capital Management LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
