Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Federal Trade Commission v. Itmedia Solutions LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Itmedia Solutions LLC, DEV.XYZ LLC, TEAM.XYZ LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
United States of America v. Maddox
as 1:2020mc00089
Defendant:
Ashley Maddox
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Petitioner:
John Hancock Retirement Plan Services, LLc
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Hancock et al
as 2:2019cv04656
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Marilyn Hancock and Vondelere James-White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Jeff Hancock v. Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc.
as 2:2019cv02602
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hancock
Defendant:
Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Gila River Indian Community v. Fourth Pioneer LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00626
Plaintiff:
Gila River Indian Community
Defendant:
Fourth Pioneer LLC, Freeport Minerals Corporation, Freeport-McMoran Safford Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hancock et al v. Keystone RV Company et al
as 2:2017cv00832
Plaintiff:
Frank Hancock , Diana Hancock and Erminio Perea
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company and Affinity RV Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Hancock v. Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
Monica Hancock
Defendant:
Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Paul Krakowski et al v. Hancock Park Rehabilitation Center LLC et al
as 2:2013cv05022
Defendant:
Does and Hancock Park Rehabilitation Center LLC
Plaintiff:
Ken Krakowski and Paul Krakowski
Swalley Irrigation District v. Gary Alvis, et al
as 08-35263
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SWALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY ALVIS, GALEN BLYTH, MEGHAN BLYTH and others
Defendant:
STEWART C. BENNETT, JOHN S. BRASSFIELD, BRIAN CHRISTEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
