Contract Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,687
DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023at00589
Plaintiff: DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Solpac Construction, Inc. dba Soltek Pacific Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc., et al. v. Solpac Construction, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Solpac Construction, Inc. a California Corporation Doing business as Soltek Pacific Construction Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Stormwater Plans LLC v. Cincinnati Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01184
Plaintiff: Stormwater Plans LLC on behalf of the United States of America doing business as SWP Contracting & Paving and Stormwater Plans LLC United States for the use and benefit of Stormwater Plans doing business as SWP Contracting & Paving
Defendant: Cincinnati Insurance Company and Arrow Indian Contractors
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
James Chou et al v. Feng Li et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02855
Defendant: Feng Li, Jianjun Qiao, Steve Li and others
Plaintiff: James Chou and CJ Max Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
United States of America et al v. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05308
Plaintiff: D&D Construction I, Inc., United States of America and D&D Construction I Inc
Defendant: Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Navajo Health Foundation-Sage Memorial Hospital Incorporated v. Becerra et al
as 3:2023cv08065
Plaintiff: Navajo Health Foundation-Sage Memorial Hospital Incorporated
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Roselyn Tso and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Commodity Trucking Acquisition, LLC v. Qwest Engineering, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00569
Plaintiff: Commodity Trucking Acquisition, LLC and United States of America
Defendant: Qwest Engineering, Inc., McCarthy Building Companies, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Jabez Holdings Inc v. GSI Pacific Inc et al
as 3:2023cv05250
Plaintiff: Jabez Holdings, Inc. JABEZ HOLDINGS, INC. d/b/a ST FABRICATION, a Washington corporation doing business as ST Fabrication, United States of America and Jabez Holdings Inc a Washington corporation doing business as ST Fabrication
Defendant: GSI Pacific, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and GSI Pacific Inc
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Finland Financial, Inc. v. PNC Bank, National Association et al
as 8:2023cv00342
Plaintiff: Finland Financial, Inc.
Defendant: PNC Bank, National Association
Cross Claimant: PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Cross Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States of America for the use of Terry Bedford Concerete Construction, Inc.
as 1:2023at00063
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the use of Terry Bedford Concerete Construction, Inc.
Defendant: Argonaut Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?