Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bohland v. Bauer et al
as 2:2010cv01213
Defendant:
John H Bauer, James A Bianco, Vartan Gregorian and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bohland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Souda v. Bauer et al
as 2:2010cv00905
Plaintiff:
Carey Souda
Defendant:
John H Bauer, James A. Bianco, M.D., Vartan Gregorian and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Cosmetic Alchemy, LLC v. Loving Lotus
as 2:2010cv01045
Plaintiff:
Cosmetic Alchemy, LLC
Defendant:
Loving Lotus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cyrek et al v. Bauer et al
as 2:2010cv00625
Plaintiff:
Paul Cyrek
Defendant:
John H Bauer, James A. Bianco, M.D., Vartan Gregorian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marbury v. Bianco et al
as 2:2010cv00578
Plaintiff:
Terry Marbury
Defendant:
James A Bianco, Jack W Singer, Phillip M Nudelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Shackleton v. Bauer et al
as 2:2010cv00564
Plaintiff:
Joseph Shackleton
Defendant:
John H Bauer, James A Bianco, Vartan Gregorian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Daniels et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2009cv01794
Plaintiff:
Lois Daniels, Andrea Carr and Genice Loving
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, John and Jane Does, I-X and ABC Corporations I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Alan Carpenter, et al v. Michael Uhl MV, et al
as 09-56138
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALAN CARPENTER and TRACY RAGSDALE, individuals
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL UHL MV, Tug, her engines, machinery, tackle, equipment, furnishings and appurtenances, in rem, MARITIME LOGISTICS, INC., FRANK LOVING, an individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
