Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Simmons v. Go Daddy ICANN IANA et al
as 2:2017cv00867
Defendant:
Go Daddy ICANN IANA and United Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Simmons
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Well Go USA Entertainment v. Haiuken, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Well Go USA Entertainment
Defendant:
Haiuken, Inc., Parakan Software, Inc. and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Elohim EPF USA Inc v. Twiterland Inc et al
as 2:2016cv07796
Defendant:
Dong Soo Cho, Woon Sook Chung, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Elohim EPF USA Inc
SNUBA International v. Green et al
as 2:2016cv01834
Plaintiff:
SNUBA International
Defendant:
Kirk Green and Wheels-2-Go LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
SNUBA International v. Green et al
as 2:2016at00957
Plaintiff:
SNUBA International
Defendant:
Kirk Green and Wheels-2-Go LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Design Collection, Inc. v. Going Out, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04297
Plaintiff:
Design Collection, Inc.
Defendant:
Does, Going Out, Inc. and J and D Fashion
Equalia, LLC et al v. PowerBoard, LLC
as 3:2016cv03259
Plaintiff:
Equalia, LLC and Hoverboard Technologies Corporation
Defendant:
PowerBoard, LLC , Patmont Revocable Trust and Go Ped Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Go Green Synthetic Lawn Solutions, LLC v. Go Green Synthetic Grass, LLC
as 3:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Go Green Synthetic Lawn Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Go Green Synthetic Grass, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Before I Go Productions, Inc. v. Doe-73.25.37.15 et al
as 3:2015cv02278
Plaintiff:
Before I Go Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Doe-24.20.61.23, Doe-50.139.36.134, Doe-67.170.142.166 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Go Ped Ltd vs Equalia LLC
as 3:2015cv00540
Defendant:
Equalia, LLC and Hoverboard Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
Go Ped Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
