Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Michael Fries v. Kernan, et al
as 19-16827
Defendant / Appellee:
PFAIFFER, R. TINSLEY, KERNAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ACHILLES FRIES
Ann Zhai v. Bridgestone Firestone Americas Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv07057
Defendant:
Engine Lubricant Manufacturers, Marketers, Distributers, and Sellers with Business Entity Names A-Z, Bridgestone Firestone Americas Inc., Retail Operations of Bridgestone Firestone Americas, and Employees 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Ann Zhai
USA v. Troy Sellers
as 19-10253
Defendant / Appellant:
TROY LUKE SELLERS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Eleazar Villegas v. Christopher Wray, et al
as 19-16226
Defendant / Appellee:
HILLARY KEITH, Senior Librarian for the City of Santa Clara, PHAN NGO, Chief of Sunnyvale Protective Services, MIKE WASSERMAN, Santa Clara County Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELEAZAR VILLEGAS
Michael Fries v. Kernan, et al
as 19-15624
Defendant / Appellee:
PFAIFFER, R. TINSLEY, KERNAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ACHILLES FRIES
Rawlings et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00452
Plaintiff:
John Stanford, Daniel Walker, Sandra Rivero and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC, VM Motori S.p.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv07576
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv07577
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Valarie Phillips et al v. DePaul Medical Center et al
as 2:2018cv03965
Defendant:
DePaul Medical Center, DePaul Medical Office, Does and others
Plaintiff:
John Payne, Valarie Phillips and Monique Sellers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
