Cases 11 - 20 of 358
United States of America v. Arzate-Molina
as 24-525
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ELIAS ARZATE-MOLINA
Aguilar Molina, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4350
Petitioner:
RIGOBERTO AGUILAR MOLINA, NORMA CUBIAS ANGEL and CARLOS AGUILAR CUBIAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Recinos v. Orthodontics, et al.
as 23-3961
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIFFANY DION RECINOS, as parent on behalf of minors minor C.E.R. minor M.J.R
Defendant / Appellee:
GESSELL ORTHODONTICS, MOLINA + PROVIDER ONE INSURANCE, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES and others
Arias Molina, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3887
Petitioner:
ZULEYMA DEL CARMEN ARIAS MOLINA and MARIANA VALENTINA HENRIQUEZ ARIAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Molina-Bonilla, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3590
Petitioner:
GALILEO MOLINA-BONILLA, KEVIN MOLINA-MORALES, MARIA DORA MORALES DE MOLINA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv01312
Plaintiff:
Lauren E Ramey
Defendant:
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ramey v. Molina Healthcare Inc
as 3:2023cv05768
Plaintiff:
Lauren E Ramey
Defendant:
Molina Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kruzel v. Molina Healthcare, Inc.
as 6:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Melissa Kruzel
Defendant:
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Castillo Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-680
Petitioner:
ROBERTO GENARO CASTILLO MARTINEZ and ONDINA ARACELY SAGASTUME MOLINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fuller et al v. Bloom Institute of Technology et al
as 3:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
Jessica Fuller, Alexander Gonclaves, Brett McAdams and others
Defendant:
Bloom Institute of Technology, Austen Allred, Does 1 - 9 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
