Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Alsina v. TD Bank US Holding Company et al
as 3:2021cv00096
Defendant:
TD Bank N.A. and TD Bank US Holding Company
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Alsina
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Power v. TD Bank USA, N.A.
as 3:2019cv01665
Plaintiff:
Matthew Power
Defendant:
TD Bank USA, N.A. and TD Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 df
Michael Tatro v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., et al
as 19-56002
Defendant:
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association, TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC., a California company, VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., a New York corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TARGET CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., a New York corporation and FDS BANK, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL P. TATRO
Timothy Dawson v. T.D. Bank US Holding Company et al
as 2:2019cv01269
Defendant:
T.D. Bank US Holding Company and TD Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dawson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
