Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Gary Francis Fisher v. Bivens,6 Unknown Agents et al
as 2:2014cv01439
Defendant:
Aguilera Barrios, Bivens,6 Unknown Agents and Ventura County, Narcotics Squard
Plaintiff:
Gary Francis Fisher
Carol Engen v. Internal Revenue Service, et al
as 13-35654
Petitioner - Appellant:
CAROL ENGEN
Respondent - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and UNKNOWN AGENTS
Carol Engen v. Internal Revenue Service, et al
as 13-35552
Petitioner - Appellant:
CAROL ENGEN
Respondent - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and UNKNOWN AGENTS
Engen v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2013cv01024
Petitioner:
Carol Engen
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Engen v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2013mc00084
Petitioner:
Carol Engen
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service and Unknown Agents
Treymel Coleman et al v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2010cv07173
Plaintiff:
Mary Callum, Treymel Coleman, K. E. and others
Defendant:
City of Pasadena, Does, Officer J. Gurrola and others
Damian Vergara Hernandez v. Arturo Ascencio et al
as 5:2008cv01776
Defendant:
An Unknown Agent of the United States Customs and Border Protection, Arturo Ascencio, William A Brett and others
Plaintiff:
Damian Vergara Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Cox v. United States of America, et al
as 08-16321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ROBERT COX, DBA JoeKen Firearms
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, A.T.F., an Agency thereof and others
Cox v. United States of America et al
as 2:2007cv01200
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Cox
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, R A Friend and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
