Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,323
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00750
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Estrada-Marroquin v. Garland
as 24-3612
Petitioner: RENE ALEXANDER ESTRADA-MARROQUIN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maribel Cazares Guerrero v. Merrick Garland et al
as 2:2024cv04369
Plaintiff: MARIBEL CAZARES GUERRERO
Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND, Ur M. Jaddou, David Radel and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Alexander Almansky v. Sing for Service, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04769
Plaintiff: Alexander Almansky
Defendant: Sing for Service, LLC doing business as Mepco, Matrix Warranty Solutions, Inc., Road America Motor Club, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Vonda et al
as 2:2024cv00794
Plaintiff: G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant: Alexander Vonda individually and: doing business as Red Bottomz and Dreamscape Partners LLC an unknown business entity doing business as Red Bottomz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02992
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Portillo Ramos v. Garland
as 24-3291
Petitioner: NERY ALEXANDER PORTILLO RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Favor v. Minaj, et al.
as 24-3115
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: NIKKI MINAJ, MAXINE A. and BABY CASH MONEY RECORDS
Favor v. Harper
as 24-3116
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: RAQUEL HARPER
Rivas-Alvarado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2947
Petitioner: JOSE JUAN RIVAS-ALVARADO, ELSA VERONICA DIAZ-ALVARADO and DIEGO ALEXANDER RIVAS-DIAZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?