Cases 21 - 30 of 329
Danielle Victor v. Southwest Wine and Spirits, LLC, et al
as 23-55256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIELLE VICTOR
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHWEST WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, WALLYS AUCTION HOUSE, LLC, a California limited liability company, MEL-JEN, a California limited liability company and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Danielle Victor v. Southwest Wine and Spirits, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00690
Plaintiff:
Danielle Victor
Defendant:
Southwest Wine and Spirits, LLC, Wallys Auction House, LLC, Mel-Jen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Orozco-Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-126
Petitioner:
LOREN ALELI OROZCO-DOMINGUEZ, ADOLFO EMANUEL DOMINGUEZ-OROZCO and ELIAS ISAAC DOMINGUEZ-OROZCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Christian Dominguez v. TD Bank, N.A.
as 2:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Christian Dominguez
Defendant:
TD Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dominguez Vidal v. Garland
as 22-2063
Petitioner:
RAYMUNDO NOE DOMINGUEZ VIDAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanabria-Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1658
Petitioner:
ANA BEATRIZ SANABRIA-DOMINGUEZ, ALDRIN ESTUARDO MARTINEZ-SANABRIA and JOSHUA DANIEL MARTINEZ-SANABRIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dominguez-Rivera v. Garland
as 21-1427
Petitioner:
ALEX GEOVANY DOMINGUEZ-RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flores Dominguez v. Garland
as 21-1394
Petitioner:
MARITZA FLORES DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
