Cases 21 - 30 of 248
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Haaland et al
as 3:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity and Audubon Society of Portland
Defendant:
Debra Haaland, Martha Williams and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Haaland et al
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Western Watersheds Project and Pat Munday
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Martha Williams and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Montana Environmental Information Center, et al v. Westmoreland Rosebud Mining LLC, et al
as 22-36002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER, INDIAN PEOPLE'S ACTION, 350 MONTANA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, U. S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, an agency within the U. S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, a federal agency and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WESTMORELAND ROSEBUD MINING LLC and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 400
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 3:2022cv05216
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity, Environmental Protection Information Center and Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Debra Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 2:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity and Idaho Conservation League
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland et al
as 1:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Martha Williams
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Fish Northwest v. Scott Rumsey, et al
as 22-35641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FISH NORTHWEST, a Washington non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT RUMSEY, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator for NOAA Fisheries' West Coast Region, CHRIS OLIVER, in his official capacity as the Assistant Administrator for National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE and KELLY SUSEWIND, in his official capacity as Director of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al
as 9:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, The Humane Society of the United States, Humane Society Legislative Fund and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Deb Haaland, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35583
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, by and through the Office of Species Conservation and the Idaho Fish and Game Commission
Center For Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, et al
as 3:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531 Endangered Species Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
