Cases 41 - 50 of 1,095
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN MARIE ANDERSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
In the Matter of the Complaint of Billy Anderson
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Billy Anderson and F/V ALASKA ROSE, Official No. 592952
Defendant:
No Defendant - Entered for Statistical Purposes Only
Cannon v. Harris, et al.
as 24-981
Plaintiff:
TYRRALL FARROW CANNON
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, DEBRA HARRIS, Judge, individual and official capacity and others
Char v. Tresch, et al.
as 24-868
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN CHAR
Defendant:
MAURA TRESCH, RICHARD BANNER, DEANE HATAKEYAMA and others
Galina Vugman v. Alteryx, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Galina Vugman
Defendant:
Alteryx, Inc., Dean Stoecker, Mark Anderson and others
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 24-534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIA CHRISTINE ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Weird Science LLC et al v. Rene Sindlev et al
as 2:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Weird Science LLC and William Anderson Wittekind
Defendant:
Rene Sindlev, Mark Dybul, Gregg Alton and others
Linan Gonzales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-373
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER ANDERSON LINAN GONZALES, RAYSHELL BETZABETH LINAN CARBAJAL, RAY ANDERSON LINAN CARBAJAL and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Vilsack et al
as 9:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council, Yellowstone to Uintas Connection and others
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack, Randy Moore, Matthew Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
