Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 166
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35412
Plaintiff / Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Defendant / Appellant: TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Amicus Curiae: ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others
Robert Fort v. Tyler Blewett
as 20-70510
Respondent: TYLER BLEWETT, Superintendent
Petitioner: ROBERT EARL FORT
Cecil Fort v. Shawn Hatton
as 19-17599
Petitioner / Appellant: CECIL LAMAR FORT
Respondent / Appellee: SHAWN HATTON, Warden, Salinas Valley
Terence Sasaki v. Mark Inch, et al
as 19-16519
Defendant / Appellee: DUTTON, C/O, FSL - Elkton, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY CLERK(S), NERO, SCHMIDT, CSO, FSL - Elkton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERENCE SASAKI
Roberts v. Zuora, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03422
Plaintiff: Casey Roberts and New Zealand Methodist Trust Association
Defendant: Zuora, Inc., Tien Tzuo and Tyler Sloat
Petitioner: Kyle J. Krauseneck, Pierre Kohler, Danish Parbtani and others
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff: Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae: HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent: State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner: Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party: Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Morgan v. Bash et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00546
Defendant: Ninety-Five Fort Apache Complex, LLC, Janice McCown, Pepperdine Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Donna Morgan
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Robert Fort v. Troy Bowser
as 19-70584
Respondent: TROY BOWSER, Warden
Petitioner: ROBERT EARL FORT
IEN, et al v. DOS, et al
as 19-35099
Plaintiff / Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS A. SHANNON, Jr., in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor: ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE and FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: TRANSCANADA CORPORATION and TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP
Amicus Curiae: ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES OF THE FORT PECK RESERVATION
Northern Plains, et al v. Thomas Shannon, Jr., et al
as 19-35064
Defendant / Appellee: RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, THOMAS A. SHANNON, Jr., in his official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: TRANSCANADA CORPORATION and TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, LP
Plaintiff / Appellant: SIERRA CLUB, BOLD ALLIANCE, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Undetermined: ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE and FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY
Amicus Curiae: ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES OF THE FORT PECK RESERVATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?