Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Nibbi Brothers, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
as 3:2009cv02231
Plaintiff:
Nibbi Brothers, Inc.
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Lexington Insurance Company et al v. Evanston Insurance Company et al
as 2:2009cv07461
Plaintiff:
Lexington Insurance Company, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
Defendant:
Evanston Insurance Company and Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
California Shock Trauma Air Re v. AIG Domestic Claims, Inc., et al
as 09-16874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA SHOCK TRAUMA AIR RESCUE
Defendant - Appellee:
AIG DOMESTIC CLAIMS, INC., AIG INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., AIG INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Excel Staffing Services, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00348
Plaintiff:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Defendant:
Excel Staffing Services Incorporated
Garnishee:
First Rate Staffing Incorporated, Clifford Blake , Green Planet Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Excel Staffing Services, Inc.
as 2:2009mc00087
Plaintiff:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Defendant:
Excel Staffing Services Incorporated
Garnishee:
First Rate Staffing Incorporated, Clifford Blake , Green Planet Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Wheaton, et al v. OWCP
as 07-72141
Petitioner:
GALE WHEATON
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
