Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Robert Jimenez v. Michael Owen, et al
as 09-71671
Petitioner:
ROBERT R. JIMENEZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL W. OWEN, Administrative Law Judge, PIONEER CREDIT RECOVERY, INC., USA FUNDS and others
Griffin v. Pioneer Credit Recovery Inc.
as 2:2009cv00184
Plaintiff:
Fred Griffin
Defendant:
Pioneer Credit Recovery Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
as 3:2008cv02071
Plaintiff:
Jason Johnson
Defendant:
Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Red River Farms et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv02078
Plaintiff:
Red River Farms, Red River Farms, Robert Mullion and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Treasury, Department of the, Henry M Paulson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hasan v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc
as 3:2008cv00476
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hasan
Defendant:
Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Coleman v. Trans Union LLC et al
as 2:2007cv02543
Defendant:
Trans Union LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc and Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christine Coleman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007at01126
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mayer v. Pioneer Credit Recovery Inc
as 3:2007cv01227
Plaintiff:
Annisa Mayer
Defendant:
Pioneer Credit Recovery Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
