Cases 51 - 60 of 221
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 5:2016mc80012
Plaintiff:
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC.
Miscellaneou:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BLATT v. GOOGLE, INC.
as 3:2015cv04266
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDREW BLATT
Defendant:
UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF GOOGLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Matera v. Google Inc.
as 5:2015cv04062
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Matera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harvey v. Google Inc.
as 3:2015cv03590
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Plaintiff:
Susan Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Google Inc. v. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
as 3:2015mc80208
Petitioner:
Google Inc.
Respondent:
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Google Inc. v. Spivak
as 5:2015cv02981
Petitioner:
Google Inc.
Respondent:
Rivka Spivak
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Request From Andorran Court for Information From Google, Inc. Preliminary Proceedings Number DP-2275-5/08(Battlia)
as 3:2015mc80168
Miscellaneou:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SimpleAir, Inc v. Google, Inc et al
as 2:2015mc00052
Plaintiff:
SimpleAir, Inc
Defendant:
Google, Inc and YouTube LLC
United States of America v. Google Inc.
as 5:2015mc80125
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Melissa Holyoak, et al v. Google, Inc., et al
as 15-15858
:
In re: GOOGLE REFERRER HEADER PRIVACY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PALOMA GAOS, ANTHONY ITALIANO and GABRIEL PRIYEV, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant:
MELISSA ANN HOLYOAK and THEODORE H. FRANK
Defendant - Appellee:
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.