Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 109
Daniel Ramirez-Medina v. USDHS, et al
as 19-36034
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL RAMIREZ-MEDINA
Ms. J.P., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 19-56400
Defendant / Appellant: LOWELL CLARK, Warden, CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, and its Subordinate Entities, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, and its Subordinate Entities and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MS. J.P., MS. J.O. and MS. R.M., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated
Jenny Flores v. William Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56326
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: JENNY LISETTE FLORES
Karen Panosyan v. Kirstjen Nielsen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56315
Respondent / Appellee: KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JASON PARK, Captain; in his official capacity as Commander, Theo Lacy Facility, ANDRE QUINONES, in his official capacity as Assistant Field Office Director for Orange County Detained Facilities, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant: KAREN PANOSYAN
Karen Panosyan v. Kirstjen Nielsen, et al
as 19-56308
Respondent / Appellee: KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JASON PARK, Captain; in his official capacity as Commander, Theo Lacy Facility, ANDRE QUINONES, in his official capacity as Assistant Field Office Director for Orange County Detained Facilities, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant: KAREN PANOSYAN
Abdul Based v. William Barr, et al
as 19-17251
Respondent / Appellee: DONALD J. TRUMP, CLAIRE M. GRADY, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security, JEAN M. KENT, in his official capacity as Las Vegas Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant: ABDUL BASED
Claudia Rueda Vidal v. Andrew Bolton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56232
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL BRIGHTMAN, in his individual capacity and ANDREW K. BOLTON, in his individual capacity
Defendant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, LEE FRANCIS CISSNA, Director of USCIS, in his official capacity, U.S. BORDER PATROL and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CLAUDIA SARAHI RUEDA VIDAL
State of California et al v. Kevin K. McAleenan
as 2:2019cv07390
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: Save the Children Federation, Inc., American Medical Association, First Focus on Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Charleston Dacoff v. Kevin McAleenan, et al
as 19-55897
Respondent / Appellee: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, DAVID MARIN, in his official capacity as Los Angeles Field Office Director, Office of Detention and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES JANECKA, in his official capacity as Warden of the Adelanto Detention Facility and others
Petitioner / Appellant: CHARLESTON EDWARD DACOFF
Daniella Auningputri, et al v. USDOJ, et al
as 19-55869
Plaintiff: KRISTINA LIMBONG, ALEX LONDA, ELDRIDGE WOY and others
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS D. HOMAN, in his official capacity as the Senior Official Performing the duties of the Director of ICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALBERT PALAR, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, ADELENA PALAR and DANIELLA AUNINGPUTRI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?