Cases 71 - 80 of 277,247
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Whole Foods Market California, Inc. et al v. Food In-Depth Inc.
as 5:2024mc80123
Petitioner:
Whole Foods Market California, Inc., Mrs. Gooch's Natural Food Markets, Inc. and Whole Foods Market Services, Inc.
Respondent:
Food In-Depth Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Violation of Credit Repair Organizations Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cowlitz County Fire Protection District No. 5 v. United States Department of Justice
as 3:2024cv05383
Plaintiff:
Cowlitz County Fire Protection District No. 5
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Office of Justice Programs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ningbo CITIC Culture Equity Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership) v. Mao et al
as 3:2024cv03041
Petitioner:
Ningbo CITIC Culture Equity Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership)
Respondent:
Jinming Mao and Jiangyang Shui
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
