Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. California Air Resources Board et al
as 2:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, California Chamber of Commerce, American Farm Bureau Federation and others
Defendant:
California Air Resources Board, Liane M. Randolph, Steven S. Cliff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Inc, Neil Lindsay and others
Interested Party:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
Computer & Communications Industry Association, NetChoice, LLC, Chamber of Progress and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
In re: Mary Carr, et al v. Google LLC, et al
as 23-15285
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GOOGLE PLAY STORE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY CARR, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DIANNE BENTLEY, JENNIFER GRACE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC, GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED, GOOGLE COMMERCE LIMITED and others
Intervenor:
AMAZON.COM LLC
Amicus Curiae:
ATLANTIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, BUSINESS AND ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS and others
NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta
as 5:2022cv08861
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, LLC doing business as NetChoice
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Eric Goldman, Chamber of Progress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EB5 CAPITAL et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 3:2022cv03948
Plaintiff:
EB5 CAPITAL, CANAM ENTERPRISES, LP, CIVITAS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Abraham Bielski v. Coinbase, Inc.
as 22-15566
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ABRAHAM BIELSKI, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
COINBASE, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER and others
Audrey Heredia, et al v. Sunrise Senior Living, LLC, et al
as 21-80121
Respondent:
AUDREY HEREDIA, as successor-in-interest to the Estate of Carlos Heredia, AMY FEARN, as successor-in-interest to the Estate of Edith Zack and HELEN GANZ, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Elise Ganz, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING, LLC and SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chamber of Commerce of the USA, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 21-16912
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION, BAY AREA COUNCIL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security
Colin Brickman v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-16785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLIN R. BRICKMAN, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals
Defendant / Appellee:
FACEBOOK, INC. and META PLATFORMS, INC.
Intervenor / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT, ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
