Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Romero et al v. Alliance RV, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Romero and Daniel Romero
Defendant:
Alliance RV, LLC doing business as Alliance RV, Pierce Buildings, LLP doing business as Pierce RV and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rosa Velazquez Martinez, et al v. William Barr
as 20-70329
Petitioner:
KEVIN DAMIAN ROMERO VELAZQUEZ, ROSA ALICIA VELAZQUEZ MARTINEZ, JADEN ALVARO ROMERO VELAZQUEZ and others
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
USA v. Daniel Romero-Romero
as 19-30146
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL ROMERO-ROMERO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Daniel Romero-Romero
as 19-30144
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL ROMERO-ROMERO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Daniel Romero
as 11-50170
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL ROMERO, AKA Bam, AKA Bambam, AKA Eddie Diaz, AKA Daniel Macias, AKA Adrian Gabriel Romero, AKA Youngster
Oscar Machado v. Cal. Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2008cv07034
Defendant:
California Dept. of Corr. and Rehabilitation, Alan W. Cox, Alan W. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Daniel Romero-Perez
as 09-50243
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL ROMERO-PEREZ
USA v. Tapia-Romero
as 05-50121
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FELIPE DANIEL TAPIA-ROMERO, a/k/a David Perales Meraz, Daniel Pato, Felipe Daniel Pato, Felipe Romero Pato, Felipe Romero, Felipe Daniel Romero, Daniel Sanchez, Danny Tapia, Felipe Tapia, Felipe Daniel Tapia, Felipe Romero Tapia, Felipe Daniel Topia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
