Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Duke v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-1524
Petitioner:
BRENT FITZGERALD DUKE
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al. v. Stratfs, LLC et al.
as 2:2024ms00010
Defendant:
Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re Naturalization Ceremony 6/30/2023
as 3:2023mc80168
In Re:
Naturalization Ceremony, Mohammad Ebrahim Ahmadi, Naqibullah Ahmadzai and others
Duke v. Kimble
as 23-723
Not Yet Classified:
AZ LEWIS LIBRARIAN and AZ EYMAN LIBRARIAN
Petitioner:
BRENT FITZGERALD DUKE
Respondent:
JAMES KIMBLE
Sharkey v. Duke et al
as 2:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
James Sharkey
Defendant:
J. Duke and Las Vegas Metro Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duke v. American Express Company
as 4:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Debra Duke
Defendant:
American Express Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Terwillegar v. Mortgage Assets Management, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Duke Terwillegar
Defendant:
Mortgage Assets Management, LLC and PHH Mortgage Corporation doing business as PHH Mortgage Services
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Naugle et al v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv09200
Plaintiff:
Kim Naugle and Afrika Williams
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Duke University Health Systems, Inc. and WakeMed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
