Cases 1 - 10 of 704
Winsor v. Shockwave Medical, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv02727
Plaintiff:
Jane Winsor
Defendant:
Shockwave Medical, Inc., Ray Larkin, Doug Godshall and others
Monterde v. Garland
as 24-2450
Petitioner:
EUGENE FRANCIS MENGUITO MONTERDE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nawsheen Duffaydar v. Sonder Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02952
Plaintiff:
Nawsheen Duffaydar
Defendant:
Sonder Holdings Inc., Francis Davidson, Chris Berry and others
Benjamin Melendez et al v. Culture Cannabis Club et al
as 2:2024cv02926
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MELENDEZ, RANJEET PANNU and BIKRAMJIT SINGH PANNU
Defendant:
CULTURE CANNABIS CLUB, SKYBOX HOLDINGS 81, MAMMOTH LEGEND CONSULTING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Benjamin Melendez et al v. Culture Cannabis Club et al
as 8:2024cv00815
Defendant:
Anh Tran, Culture Cannabis Club, Skybox Holdings 81 and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Melendez, Ranjeet Pannu and Bikramjit Singh Pannu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Wilson
as 24-2142
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANEIL FRANCIS WILSON, II
Beck v. Catanzarite Law Corporation, et al.
as 24-1727
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN S. BECK
Defendant:
CATANZARITE LAW CORPORATION, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, RUBEN DURAN and others
Romero Calderon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1578
Petitioner:
FRANCIS PAMELA ROMERO CALDERON, AARO ENRIQUE DIAZ ROMERO and VALERY SOFIA DIAZ ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Char v. Tresch, et al.
as 24-868
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN CHAR
Defendant:
MAURA TRESCH, RICHARD BANNER, DEANE HATAKEYAMA and others
Doane v. Conversion Kings LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Robert A Doane
Defendant:
Conversion Kings LLC, Michael W Muhlethaler and Francis J Wood, IV
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
