Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Christine Alire, et al v. The Gap, Inc., et al
as 21-55752
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTINE ALIRE
Plaintiff:
SHADI HAYDEN, JERRY HO, WILLIAM HANNUM and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THE GAP, INC.
Defendant:
THE RETAIL EQUATION, INC., SEPHORA USA, INC., ADVANCE AUTO PARTS and others
James Murphy v. Thomas Welhelm, et al
as 21-35367
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. WELHELM, M.D. and HOOD RIVER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Defendant:
CITY OF HOOD RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL MURPHY, MD
Murphy, MD v. Wilhelm
as 3:2021cv00349
Defendant:
M.D. Thomas J Wilhelm
Plaintiff:
James Michael Murphy, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
James Murphy v. USAF, et al
as 20-35067
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, JEFFERY SILVER, Brig. General Ref., MICHAEL STENCEL, Major General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL MURPHY, MD
Thomas Matthews v. County of San Diego, et al
as 19-56140
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, DAN MCALLISTER, Employed by County of San Diego Treasurer's Office, in his official and individual capacity, SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS MATTHEWS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018at01321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Matthews v. San Diego County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2018cv00711
Plaintiff:
Thomas Matthews
Defendant:
San Diego County Board of Supervisors , Teresa Willis, Michael Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JBP Services, P.C. et al v. Michael Murphy et al
as 8:2017cv01651
Defendant:
Ahtovation, Inc., DOES and Michael Murphy
Plaintiff:
JBP Services, P.C. and James B. Pickell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
