Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 199
State of Nebraska et al v. Cliff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01364
Plaintiff: State of Nebraska, State of Alabama, Arizona State Legislature and others
Defendant: Steven S. Cliff and Robert A. Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Utah Sell Now LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00540
Plaintiff: Chelsea James
Defendant: Utah Sell Now LLC doing business as Joe Homebuyer, Joe Home Buyer AZ LLC, Offer Arizona LLC doing business as Joe Homebuyer Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mirabadi v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., et al.
as 24-1487
Plaintiff: FARAH MIRABADI, individual and on behalf of a class of other similarly situated individual
Defendant: SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., a Utah Corporation and DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, et al.
as 24-994
Plaintiff: APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Defendant: HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, a Utah limited liability company and CHRIS HOWELL, an individual
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant: STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court: XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor: THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Valles v. Attorney General of the United States, et al.
as 23-1674
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREW VALLES
Defendant / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF UTAH
Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. USDC-CASD
as 23-70109
Not Classified By Court: In re: APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, CHRIS HOWELL, an individual and others
Petitioner: APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant: Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
State of Washington, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-35294
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT M. CALIFF, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Petitioner / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF MONTANA and others
Kelli Salazar, et al v. USDC-AZPIn re: Kelli Salazar, et al v. USDC-AZP
as 23-70046
Not Classified By Court: In re: KELLI SALAZAR, WAYNE CARPENTER, RODNEY LOPEZ and others
Petitioner: KELLI SALAZAR and GREGORY HANNA, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?