Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Flynn v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00200
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Dale Flynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flynn, Jr. v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2018cv07747
Plaintiff:
James Flynn, Jr.
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flynn et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv05084
Plaintiff:
Venus Flynn , Autumn Flynn and G. F.
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Rental Insurance Services Inc and Lorraine Craig
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Flynn v. Gunderson Rail Service LLC
as 3:2018cv05064
Plaintiff:
Brian Flynn
Defendant:
Gunderson Rail Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flynn et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01407
Plaintiff:
Amanda Rene Flynn and James Brandon Flynn
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flynn v. Dennis et al
as 3:2017cv05316
Plaintiff:
Venus Flynn
Defendant:
Jessica Dennis , John Doe Dennis , Eric Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Wolf et al v. Cordis Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv01321
Plaintiff:
Sharlene Wolf , Charmaine Bacon , John Beshears and others
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation and Confluent Medical Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cynthia Faye Davis et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07118
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Adams, Terry M. Anders, Karla D. Auld and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Flynn v Clausen, et al
as 3:2015cv05119
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Flynn
Defendant:
Michael Clausen, Diane M Clausen, Clausen Fisheries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Sharon Parker et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00496
Plaintiff:
Regina Anderson, Sylvia Carrell, Patricia Flynn and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
