Cases 71 - 80 of 116
Modrow v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01310
Plaintiff:
Thelma Modrow
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandos v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Ralph Chandos
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. , C.R. Bard, Inc. and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
West v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02140
Plaintiff:
Glenda West
Defendant:
Davol Inc., C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Devices Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hinke v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv04891
Plaintiff:
John Hinke and John Hinke
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc., C.R. Bard Inc., C.R. Bard Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hinke v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv04891
Plaintiff:
John Hinke and John Hinke
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc., C.R. Bard Inc., C.R. Bard Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hanson et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01255
Plaintiff:
Mark Hanson and Stephanie Hanson
Defendant:
Davol Inc, Bard Devices Inc, CR Bard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cedergren, et al. v. Davol, Inc., et al.
as 1:2009cv01570
Plaintiff:
Deena Cedergren and James Cedergren
Defendant:
Davol Inc., C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Devices Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bartsch v. Davol, Inc. et al.
as 2:2009cv02492
Plaintiff:
Cindy Bartsch
Defendant:
Davol Inc., C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Devices Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02476
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Davis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C R Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Melom v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2009at00603
Plaintiff:
Patricia Melom
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
