Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Francisco Ferrero Rodriguez v. Netflix Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02302
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ferreras Rodriguez
Defendant:
Netflix Inc., Nolita Cinema, David M Rosenthal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Melchor Limpin v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-55879
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELCHOR KARL T. LIMPIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, In His Official Capacity, LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Former U.S. Attorney General, PORTER, Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") Officer and others
Limpin v. Garland et al
as 3:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
Melchor Karl T. Limpin
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Loretta E. Lynch, Officer Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b Fed. Question: Bivens Act
Lauck v. Campbell, County of et al
as 3:2021cv08036
Plaintiff:
David M Lauck
Defendant:
Black Diamond Investigation and Security Incorporated, Unknown Parties, Campbell, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Riley et al v. Neutron Holdings Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00146
Defendant:
Segway Incorporated, Ninebot, Neutron Holdings Incorporated a Delaware Corporation doing business as Lime and others
Plaintiff:
David M Riley and Kendra D Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kram v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 2:2020cv02177
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Amtrak
Plaintiff:
David M. Kram
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Clift et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv06200
Plaintiff:
David M. Clift and Diane Clift
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lucas v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv02505
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc
Plaintiff:
David M. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2019cv06450
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David M. Ross, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Carmeliza M. Day-Ross and David M. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMahon v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02783
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
David M McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
