Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Livernois v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv02277
Plaintiff: William Livernois
Defendant: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, York International Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States of America, et al v. Safeco Insurance Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00452
Plaintiff: United States of America, Ellen M. McCracken, U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Defendant: Safeco Insurance Company, Shapiro & Sutherland LLC, K. Sutherland and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Nesse v. Walmart Stores Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00362
Plaintiff: Kristine Nesse and Fred Knudsen
Defendant: Walmart Stores Inc and General Electric Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller et al v. Asbestos Corporation, LTD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00317
Defendant: 3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Co., Asbestos Corporation, LTD and others
Plaintiff: Henry G. Miller and Laurence J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Nelson et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00162
Plaintiff: Richard J. Nelson and Stephanie A. Nelson
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , CBS Corporation , Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dideon et al v. CBS Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv01018
Plaintiff: Arden L. Dideon and Cleo K. Dideon
Defendant: CBS Corporation , Asbestos Corporation Limited , Carrier Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Roth v. Fraser's Boiler Service Incorporated et al
as 3:2013cv00209
Defendant: Fraser's Boiler Service Incorporated, General Electric Co, Hopeman Brothers and others
Plaintiff: Jeanetta E. Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Buczkowski v. General Electric Co. et al
as 3:2012cv02042
Plaintiff: Mrs Kathleen Buczkowski
Defendant: General Electric Co., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Owens Illinois Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Asmaa Guennoon, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16771
: In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant: ASMAA GUENNOON, individually, as legal guardian of Kenza Tazi Moukha and Amina Tazi Moukha, and as successor-in-interest to and Personal Representative of the Estate of Rajea Tazi Moukha, deceased, M'BARKA ASRI, individually, as legal guardian of Mohamed Amine Faouzi and Zayed Faouzi, and as successor-in-interest to and Personal Representative of the Estate of Ahmed Faouzi, deceased, ASMAA BERGHAZI, individually, as legal guardian of Yassine Haddour and Yazid Haddour, and as successor-in-interest to and Personal Representative of the Estate Fouad Haddour, deceased and others
Defendant - Appellee: AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others
Margita Gergelova, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16767
: In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARGITA GERGELOVA, and as successor -in-interest to Arnold Gergel, deceased and as co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Arnold Gergel, VIKTOR GERGEL, and as successor-in-interest to Arnold Gergel, deceased, and as co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Arnold Gergel, ALIA FAROUKH, and as legal guardian for Karim Warde Khalifeh and Mohamad Ali Khalifeh, as successor-in-interest to Hussein Mounir Khalifeh deceased and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hussein Mounir Khalifeh and others
Defendant - Appellee: AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?