Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Pelz v. Pelz et al
as 5:2024cv02078
Plaintiff: Marilyn Pelz
Defendant: Kent Pelz and SF Markets, LLC, erroneously sued as Sprouts Farmers Market
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Frances Fernandez et al v. Favorite World, LLC
as 8:2024cv00714
Plaintiff: Frances Fernandez and Cecille Nguyen
Defendant: Favorite World, LLC doing business as Shapermint Erroneously Sued As Favorite World, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
L.C. v. County of Orange et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2024cv00479
Plaintiff: L.C a minor, through his Guardian ad Litem, JENNIFER CASTELLANOS and L. C.
Defendant: COUNTY OF ORANGE erroneously sued as Orange County Sheriffs Dept., County of Orange and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sarjeant et al v. City of Long Beach et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01216
Defendant: ALLIED FLUID PRODUCTS CORP., formerly known as ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., KM Industries Holding Co., Inc., formerly known as Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc., Owl Companies, individually and as parent, alter-ego-equitable trustee, joint venture, and as succesoor-in-interest to Smith-Amelco and Owl Constuctors, formerly known as HC. Smith Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff: James Sarjeant and Lucretia Sarjeant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00408
Interested Party: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval, Inc. (sued indiv. and as sii to DeLaval Separator Company and Sharples Inc.), General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Scott L. Hultner et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2024cv00409
Plaintiff: Scott L Hultner, Geraldine E Hultner, Scott L. Hultner and others
Petitioner: Alfa Laval, Inc. (sued indiv. and as sii to DeLaval Separator Company and Sharples Inc.)
Interested Party: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., General Electric Company, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. (sued individually and as succesor-in-interest to DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.) and others
Defendant: Paramount Global, Redco Corporation, Air and Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Carlos Arenas v. Festival Fun Parks, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: Carlos Arenas
Defendant: Palace Entertainment dba Castle Park and Festival Fun Parks, LLC doing business as Castle Park Erroneously Sued As Palace Entertainment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Mary Kamaka v. OSI Flemings, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10269
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Mary Kamaka and Mary Kamaka
Defendant: Defendant OSI/FLEMINGS, LLC, OSI Flemings LLC doing business as Flemings Prime Steakhouse and Wine Bar Erroneously Sued As Bloomin Brands, Inc., Doe 1 Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Mary Kamaka v. OSI Flemings, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02331
Plaintiff: Mary Kamaka
Defendant: OSI Flemings LLC doing business as Flemings Prime Steakhouse and Wine Bar Erroneously Sued As Bloomin Brands, Inc., Doe 1 Manager and Does 2-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Rawlings v. American Optical Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01794
Plaintiff: Richard Rawlings
Defendant: Greene Tweed & Co., Inc., American Optical Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?