Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Kryst Zawadzki v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2022cv03858
Petitioner:
Kryst Zawadzki
Respondent:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kryst Zawadzki v. INS. et al
as 2:2021cv07933
Petitioner:
Kryst Zawadzki
Respondent:
INS. and Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Samuelian v. CA Franchise Tax Board et al
as 2:2019cv01333
Defendant:
Sacramento County Tax Courts, CA Franchise Tax Board, CA Dept of Tax and Fee Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra C. Samuelian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Benjamin L. Fortson v. Los Angeles Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv07776
Defendant:
Gregory A. Dorfman, C. Parszik, Malaika Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Fortson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. FBI et al
as 3:2017cv01302
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Dept of Justice, FBI and others
Plaintiff:
Kambarami Tapiwa Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Birch et al v. Solicitor General et al
as 2:2015cv02184
Plaintiff:
Milton Birch and Renee Birch
Defendant:
Dept of Justice, Internal Revenue Service and Solicitor General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Flaherty v. Lincoln City Police Department
as 2:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
John P. Flaherty
Defendant:
Lincoln City Police Department, D. Krause, Paul Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flaherty
as 2:2011at00057
Plaintiff:
John P. Flaherty
Defendant:
Lincoln City Police Department, Traffic officer Krause, Paul Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul E Marshall v. Supreme Court of State of Missisippi et al
as 2:2010cv07802
Defendant:
Hardy Wilson Memorial Hosp, Medcamp Inc, Lemar Pickard and others
Plaintiff:
Paul E Marshall
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
