Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Oliver B Mitchell v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2013cv06030
Defendant:
Donna Beiter, Lisa K Holliday, Eric K Shinseki and others
Plaintiff:
Oliver B Mitchell, III
Ituarte v. The Honorable Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Eloy Ituarte
Defendant:
Kurt Schlegelmilch and The Honorable Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Romeo De Fernandez, et al v. United States Department of Ve, et al
as 13-15526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROMEO R. DE FERNANDEZ, CIRIACO C. DELA CRUZ, VALERIANO C. MARCELINO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, MICHAEL WALCOFF, Acting Under Secretary, Veterans Benefits Administration and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Shinseki
as 6:2013cv00186
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki
Plaintiff:
William E Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv11025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joseph Anoruo v. Eric Shinseki
as 12-17482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH CHIDI ANORUO
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veteran Affairs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00554
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
