Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Michael McHugh v. County of Pima, et al
as 14-15247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCHUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF PIMA, CLERENCE W. DUPNIK, Sheriff, CITY OF TUCSON and others
Lorenzo et al v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2013cv00568
Petitioner:
Windyceslau D. Lorenzo and United States of America
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie and John and Jane Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Salazar v. Steiner et al
as 1:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Randy J. Salazar , Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Steiner, City and County of Honolulu , John Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brian Cortland v. Jeffrey Myers, et al
as 11-35973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN CORTLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY SCOTT MYERS, DINA B MYERS, individually, maritally, and severally, LAW LYMAN DANIEL KAMERRER & BOGDANOVICH PS and others
Cortland v. Myers et al
as 3:2011cv05489
Plaintiff:
Brian Cortland
Defendant:
Jeffrey S Myers , Dina B Myers , Law Lyman Daniel Kamerrer & Bogdanovich PS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Yarcho v. City of Issaquah, et al
as 11-35386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M YARCHO
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ISSAQUAH, AVA FRISINGER, LEON KOSS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
