Cases 21 - 30 of 719
Reddick v. Carson City School District et al
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Melissa Martinez Reddick
Defendant:
Carson City School District, Tammy Borremans, Amy Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Stuart Robinson v. Clise Properties Inc
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
Clise Properties Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stuart Robinson v. City of Seattle
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Robinson v. Bettencourt et al
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Rose A. Robinson
Defendant:
Dennis Bettencourt, Costal Capital Private Lender & Investments and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
