Cases 31 - 40 of 653
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Ernest Bonner, Jr. v. Kimberly Kirchmeyer, et al
as 23-15212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNEST L. BONNER, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY KIRCHMEYER, CYNDIE KOUZA, CATHY L. LOZANO and others
Defendant:
MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, DENISE PINES, DEV CNANADEV and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rickey L. Alford v. Danny Bakewell, Jr. et al
as 2:2022cv09476
Plaintiff:
Rickey L. Alford and Morris Day
Defendant:
Danny Bakewell, Jr., Pamela Bakewell, Brandon Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Babbitt v. California Dep. of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv02196
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Babbitt
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Lambert, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16776
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Norman Howard Ellis v. Rob Bonta et al
as 8:2022cv01995
Plaintiff:
Norman Howard Ellis
Defendant:
Rob Bonta and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
