Cases 31 - 40 of 252
Ellis v. State of Arizona et al
as 2:2022cv01480
Plaintiff:
Michael G Ellis
Defendant:
State of Arizona, JP Morgan Chase, Thomas Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ellis v. Teton Springs Operations LLC
as 4:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ellis
Defendant:
Teton Springs Operations LLC doing business as Bronze Buffalo Sporting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Riley et al
as 2:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
Cleophus C. Clark
Defendant:
Det. G. Riley, Det. Ellis, Officer V. Ferlini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Benshoof v. Fauci et al
as 2:2022cv01281
Plaintiff:
Kurt A Benshoof
Defendant:
Anthony Fauci, Rochelle Walensky, Stephen Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ellis v. City of Pittsburgh et al
as 3:2022cv04958
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Ellis
Defendant:
City of Pittsburgh, Shanelle Preston, Jelani Killings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
